Uncategorized

The Stigma Facing Women Living with Hepatitis

A diagnosis of viral hepatitis should mark the beginning of care, treatment, and support not discrimination. Yet for many women and girls, hepatitis carries a burden that extends far beyond the disease itself. Across many communities, women living with hepatitis often face stigma, social isolation, and unfair judgment that affect their health, relationships, livelihoods, and overall well-being. These experiences not only violate their rights but also discourage many from seeking timely testing, treatment, and support, allowing the disease to spread silently within families and communities. ¹
Viral hepatitis, particularly hepatitis B and C, remains a major public health concern worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), an estimated 304 million people were living with chronic hepatitis B or C in 2022, while 1.3 million deaths occurred from hepatitis-related liver diseases, including cirrhosis and liver cancer.² Despite the availability of effective vaccines for hepatitis B and curative treatment for hepatitis C, millions remain undiagnosed, especially in low- and middle-income countries where awareness and access to healthcare are limited.²
For women, the impact of hepatitis is often compounded by gender inequality and harmful social norms. In many societies, women are expected to shoulder the responsibility for family health and caregiving. When they are diagnosed with hepatitis, they may be blamed for bringing illness into the home or wrongly assumed to have contracted the infection through immoral behaviour. These misconceptions persist even though hepatitis B and C are primarily transmitted through contact with infected blood and body fluids, unsafe medical procedures, unsterilized equipment, or from an infected mother to her baby during childbirth. ³
The consequences of stigma are particularly severe during pregnancy. Pregnant women who avoid antenatal care or hepatitis testing because they fear discrimination may unknowingly pass hepatitis B to their babies during delivery. Without appropriate interventions, the risk of mother-to-child transmission can be as high as 90% when mothers are highly infectious. However, this risk can be dramatically reduced through routine antenatal screening, timely administration of the hepatitis B birth-dose vaccine, and appropriate medical care. ⁴ Early diagnosis therefore protects not only mothers but also the next generation.
Stigma also affects girls and young women in less visible ways. Fear of being judged may prevent adolescents from seeking accurate health information, vaccination, or medical attention. Women who experience discrimination are more likely to delay treatment, conceal their diagnosis, or withdraw from social support networks, increasing their risk of severe liver disease and poor mental health outcomes. Studies have shown that stigma associated with chronic infectious diseases can contribute to anxiety, depression, reduced self-esteem, and lower quality of life. ⁵
The effects extend beyond individuals to entire communities. When people fear being labelled or rejected, they are less likely to participate in screening programmes or disclose their status to healthcare providers and close contacts. This delays diagnosis, limits access to treatment, and undermines efforts to eliminate viral hepatitis as a public health threat. The World Health Organization has set a goal of eliminating viral hepatitis by 2030, but this target cannot be achieved if stigma continues to keep people away from lifesaving services. ⁶
Ending stigma begins with replacing myths with facts. Hepatitis is not spread through hugging, shaking hands, sharing meals, coughing, or casual social contact. ³ People living with hepatitis deserve compassion, respect, confidentiality, and access to quality healthcare not fear or exclusion. Communities, healthcare workers, religious institutions, schools, and the media all have a role to play in promoting accurate information and challenging harmful stereotypes.
Governments and health organizations must also strengthen policies that ensure routine hepatitis screening, particularly for pregnant women, expand access to vaccination and treatment, and integrate psychosocial support into hepatitis care. Public education campaigns should highlight that hepatitis is a medical condition that can often be prevented, managed, and in some cases cured, rather than a reason for discrimination.
No woman or girl should have to choose between protecting her health and protecting herself from stigma. By creating supportive communities where women can seek testing, treatment, and care without fear, we move closer to eliminating hepatitis and safeguarding the health of families and future generations. Ending hepatitis is not only about medical advances it is also about ending the silence, misinformation, and discrimination that allow the disease to persist.

References
1. World Health Organization. Global health sector strategies on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections 2022–2030. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053779
2. World Health Organization. Hepatitis. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis
3. World Health Organization. Hepatitis B. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-b
4. World Health Organization. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus. https://www.who.int/teams/immunization-vaccines-and-biologicals/diseases/hepatitis
5. World Hepatitis Alliance. Breaking Down Barriers: The Impact of Hepatitis Stigma. https://www.worldhepatitisalliance.org
6. World Health Organization. Global health sector strategy on viral hepatitis. https://www.who.int/teams/global-hiv-hepatitis-and-stis-programmes/hepatitis/strategic-information

The Stigma Facing Women Living with Hepatitis Read More »

Air Pollution: An Invisible Threat to Our Lungs, Hearts, and Children

Every breath we take should sustain life, yet billions of people inhale polluted air that silently harms their health. Unlike contaminated food or water, air pollution is often invisible, making it one of the world’s most dangerous environmental health threats. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), air pollution contributes to approximately 6.7 million premature deaths each year, making it a leading cause of disease and death globally. ¹

Air pollution consists of harmful substances such as fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅), nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, ozone, carbon monoxide, and other toxic pollutants released from vehicles, industries, power plants, open waste burning, household cooking fuels, and natural events like wildfires.² Fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅) is especially dangerous because it penetrates deep into the lungs and enters the bloodstream, affecting nearly every organ in the body.³ Today, about 99% of the world’s population breathes air that fails to meet WHO air quality standards. ¹

The lungs are the first organs affected. Long-term exposure to polluted air increases the risk of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, chronic bronchitis, lung cancer, and frequent respiratory infections.⁴ Persistent coughing, wheezing, chest tightness, and shortness of breath are common among people living in highly polluted environments.

Air pollution also damages the heart. Fine particles entering the bloodstream cause inflammation, raise blood pressure, damage blood vessels, and increase the risk of heart attacks, strokes, heart failure, and other cardiovascular diseases. Research consistently shows that prolonged exposure to PM₂.₅ significantly increases cardiovascular risk, even among people without traditional risk factors. ³

Children are among the most vulnerable. Because their lungs and immune systems are still developing, they breathe more polluted air relative to their body weight than adults. Exposure before and after birth has been linked to premature birth, low birth weight, asthma, pneumonia, impaired lung development, and reduced cognitive performance.⁶ UNICEF estimates that nearly 500,000 children under five die from pneumonia each year, with air pollution being a major contributing factor.⁶

Beyond its health effects, air pollution places enormous pressure on healthcare systems and national economies through increased medical costs, reduced productivity, and premature deaths⁸

The good news is that air pollution is largely preventable. Governments can strengthen air quality regulations, promote clean energy, improve public transportation, and reduce industrial emissions. Individuals can also help by avoiding open burning, maintaining vehicles, conserving energy, planting trees, and supporting cleaner technologies.

Clean air is not a luxury—it is a fundamental human right. Protecting air quality will save lives, safeguard children’s futures, reduce heart and lung diseases, and create healthier communities for generations to come.

References
1. World Health Organization. Ambient (outdoor) air pollution. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health
2. World Health Organization. Air pollution. Available at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution
3. World Health Organization. WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228
4. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Outdoor Air Pollution. Available at: https://www.iarc.who.int/cancer-type/outdoor-air-pollution
5. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)
6. UNICEF & World Health Organization. Air Pollution and Child Health: Prescribing Clean Air. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/reports/air-pollution-child-health-prescribing-clean-air
7. World Health Organization. Household air pollution and health. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/household-air-pollution-and-health
8. World Bank. The Global Health Cost of PM2.5 Air Pollution. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/pollution

Air Pollution: An Invisible Threat to Our Lungs, Hearts, and Children Read More »

The Cost of Gender Inequality

Gender inequality is more than a social issue; it is a barrier to justice, development, and human progress. Across the world, millions of women and girls continue to face discrimination that limits their access to education, healthcare, employment, leadership opportunities, and basic human rights. For many, especially those without a voice or platform to speak out, inequality remains a daily reality that shapes every aspect of their lives. ¹
One of the greatest costs of gender inequality is the loss of opportunity. Despite progress in recent decades, more than 122 million girls remain out of school globally. ³ Many are forced into child marriage, domestic labor, or other circumstances that prevent them from reaching their full potential. Yet research consistently shows that educating girls improves health outcomes, reduces poverty, and strengthens economies. ⁴
Gender inequality also places women and girls at greater risk of poor health outcomes. In many communities, women have limited control over decisions affecting their health and wellbeing. This contributes to preventable maternal deaths, inadequate access to healthcare services, and poor reproductive health outcomes. In 2020 alone, approximately 287,000 women died from preventable pregnancy and childbirth-related causes worldwide. ⁵
Violence against women remains another painful consequence of inequality. Nearly one in three women globally experiences physical or sexual violence during her lifetime. ⁶ Many victims remain silent due to fear, stigma, and lack of support, while countless others never receive justice.
The economic impact is equally significant. Women continue to earn less than men and face greater barriers to employment, financial resources, and leadership positions. According to the International Labour Organization, women earn about 20% less than men globally. ⁷ The World Bank further estimates that gender inequality costs countries trillions of dollars in lost human capital and productivity. ⁹
Gender inequality does not only harm women and girls it weakens families, communities, and nations. When women are denied equal opportunities, societies lose talent, innovation, and economic growth. ¹⁰ Conversely, countries that invest in gender equality experience stronger development outcomes, healthier populations, and more inclusive economies. ¹¹
Achieving gender equality requires more than policies and promises. It demands deliberate action to protect the rights of women and girls, expand access to education and healthcare, eliminate harmful practices, and create spaces where their voices are heard and respected.
The cost of gender inequality is simply too high. Every girl denied an education, every woman denied an opportunity, and every victim denied justice represents a loss not only to individuals but to society. Building a fairer world begins with ensuring that women and girls have the same rights, opportunities, and freedoms as everyone else.

References
1. https://www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/facts-and-figures
2. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report
3. https://www.unicef.org/education/girls-education
4. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality
5. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women
6. https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/equality-and-discrimination/gender-equality
7. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/gender/publication/unrealized-potential-the-high-cost-of-gender-inequality-in-earnings
8. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/the-power-of-parity-advancing-womens-equality-in-africa
9. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal5

The Cost of Gender Inequality Read More »

Why Primary Healthcare Matters

For millions of Nigerians, the Primary Healthcare Centre (PHC) is the closest and sometimes the only place where they can receive medical care. Yet, despite serving as the foundation of Nigeria’s healthcare system, many Primary Healthcare Centres remain underfunded, understaffed, poorly equipped, or inaccessible, leaving millions of people without the quality healthcare they deserve.

Primary healthcare is the first level of contact between individuals and the health system. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), it provides comprehensive healthcare services that meet between 80 and 90 percent of an individual’s essential health needs throughout their lifetime (1). These services include health promotion, disease prevention, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, palliative care, maternal and child healthcare, immunization, nutrition services, family planning, HIV and tuberculosis services, mental healthcare, and health education. By bringing these essential services closer to where people live, primary healthcare ensures that healthcare is accessible, affordable, and equitable.

Nigeria has over 30,000 Primary Healthcare Centres distributed across its 774 Local Government Areas (5,7). However, reports from the Federal Ministry of Health indicate that only a fraction of these facilities consistently provide comprehensive, quality services because many lack adequate infrastructure, electricity, clean water, medical equipment, essential medicines, and sufficient healthcare personnel (5). In some rural communities, residents travel several kilometres to reach the nearest functional health facility, often delaying treatment until illnesses become severe.

One of the greatest strengths of primary healthcare is its focus on prevention. Early diagnosis and timely treatment improve health outcomes while reducing the financial burden on families and the healthcare system. Preventive healthcare has consistently been shown to be far more cost-effective than managing advanced diseases that require hospitalization and specialized care (1,6).

Primary healthcare is also essential for improving maternal and child health. Nigeria accounts for one of the highest burdens of maternal and child mortality globally. According to the United Nations Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group, Nigeria recorded approximately 1,047 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births in 2020, one of the highest maternal mortality ratios in the world (3). In addition, UNICEF reports that millions of Nigerian children still miss essential vaccines each year, making the country one of the largest contributors to the global number of “zero-dose” children – those who have not received even a single routine vaccine (4).

Primary healthcare also plays a central role in controlling infectious diseases. According to the World Malaria Report 2024, Nigeria accounts for approximately 27 percent of all global malaria cases and about 31 percent of malaria-related deaths worldwide (2). The diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and distribution of insecticide-treated mosquito nets are largely coordinated through primary healthcare facilities. Strengthening these facilities directly contributes to reducing malaria-related illness and deaths.
Beyond routine healthcare, Primary healthcare Centres serve as the country’s first line of defence during disease outbreaks and public health emergencies. Whether responding to cholera outbreaks, Lassa fever, meningitis, COVID-19, or emerging infectious diseases, Primary Healthcare Centres play a central role in disease surveillance, case detection, public awareness, vaccination campaigns, contact tracing, and referrals (1,5). Community health workers are often the first professionals to identify unusual disease patterns and alert public health authorities before outbreaks escalate.

Investing in primary healthcare also makes economic sense. The World Bank estimates that investments in primary healthcare generate substantial economic returns because preventing illness costs significantly less than treating advanced disease (6). When affordable healthcare is available within communities, families are less likely to experience catastrophic health expenditures that push them deeper into poverty when affordable healthcare is available within their communities.

Unfortunately, many Nigerian communities continue to experience the consequences of weak primary healthcare systems (5,7). Health centres without skilled personnel, essential medicines, functional laboratories, ambulances, reliable electricity, clean water, or adequate medical equipment cannot provide quality services. Patients are often referred unnecessarily to already overcrowded secondary and tertiary hospitals, increasing waiting times, treatment costs, and avoidable deaths. Pregnant women may be forced to deliver at home or travel long distances while in labour. Children may miss life-saving immunizations because vaccines are unavailable or cold-chain equipment is non-functional.

The consequences extend beyond health. Weak primary healthcare reduces workforce productivity, increases school absenteeism, places greater financial pressure on households, and perpetuates poverty. Ultimately, no nation can achieve sustainable development without a strong and accessible primary healthcare system, because the health of its people is fundamental to its social and economic progress (6).

Governments at all levels must prioritize sustained investment in Primary Healthcare Centres. Strengthening primary healthcare is not merely a health sector priority, it is an investment in Nigeria’s future. It is the foundation upon which healthier families, stronger communities, and prosperous nations are built.

Every Nigerian, regardless of where they live or their socio-economic status, deserves access to a well-equipped Primary Healthcare Centre capable of delivering safe, timely, and quality healthcare.

References
1. World Health Organization (WHO). Primary Health Care. Geneva: WHO; 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/primary-health-care
2. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2024. Geneva: WHO; 2024.
3. United Nations Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 2000–2020. New York: United Nations; 2023.
4. UNICEF Nigeria. Immunization and Zero-Dose Children in Nigeria. Abuja: UNICEF Nigeria.
5. Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. Nigeria Health Sector Renewal Investment Initiative. Abuja: Federal Government of Nigeria.
6. World Bank. Primary Health Care and Universal Health Coverage. Washington, DC: World Bank.
7. National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA). Primary Health Care Under One Roof (PHCUOR) Policy. Abuja: NPHCDA.

Why Primary Healthcare Matters Read More »

The WASH Crisis Affecting African Children

Access to clean water, safe sanitation, and proper hygiene collectively known as Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) is not a luxury but a fundamental human right. Yet, for millions of children across Africa, this right remains unfulfilled. Every day, children are exposed to contaminated water, poor sanitation facilities, and inadequate hygiene conditions that threaten their health, education, dignity, and future. The WASH crisis is one of Africa’s most pressing public health challenges, silently contributing to preventable diseases, malnutrition, school absenteeism, and child mortality.

According to the WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP), an estimated 2.1 billion people worldwide still lack access to safely managed drinking water, while 3.4 billion people do not have safely managed sanitation services. Furthermore, 1.7 billion people are unable to wash their hands with soap and water at home because they lack basic handwashing facilities (1). The burden of this crisis falls disproportionately on low- and middle-income countries, with sub-Saharan Africa recording some of the lowest levels of access to safe WASH services.

For African children, the consequences are severe. UNICEF estimates that 190 million children in ten African countries face a dangerous combination of water scarcity, unsafe drinking water, poor sanitation, climate-related shocks, and recurring disease outbreaks (2).

One of the most devastating consequences of poor WASH is the high prevalence of diarrhoeal diseases. According to the World Health Organization, diarrhoea remains one of the leading causes of death among children under five years of age, claiming approximately 443,000 young lives every year worldwide. More importantly, WHO estimates that 58% of diarrhoeal diseases are directly linked to unsafe water, poor sanitation, and inadequate hygiene (3). These are illnesses that can largely be prevented through access to clean water, improved sanitation, and proper hygiene practices.

The health effects extend far beyond diarrhoea. Poor WASH conditions increase the spread of cholera, typhoid fever, dysentery, hepatitis A, intestinal worm infections, trachoma, and several neglected tropical diseases. Children suffering from repeated infections often experience dehydration, nutrient loss, weakened immunity, and chronic undernutrition. Studies have shown that repeated episodes of diarrhoea significantly contribute to stunting, a condition that affects both physical growth and brain development, reducing children’s cognitive abilities and limiting their educational achievement and future productivity (4).

The recent cholera outbreaks across Africa further illustrate the urgency of the situation. Between January 2024 and March 2025, countries in Eastern and Southern Africa reported more than 178,000 cholera cases and nearly 2,900 deaths, with children among the most vulnerable groups (5). Cholera spreads rapidly in communities where access to clean water and sanitation is limited, highlighting the direct relationship between inadequate WASH infrastructure and disease outbreaks.

The WASH crisis also affects children’s education. Millions of African children miss school because they are sick from waterborne diseases or because they spend hours each day fetching water for their families. UNICEF reports that girls are particularly affected. Many adolescent girls skip classes or drop out of school due to the absence of private, clean, and functional toilets and inadequate menstrual hygiene facilities. This not only affects academic performance but also perpetuates gender inequality and limits future opportunities (6).

Fortunately, investing in WASH produces remarkable health and economic returns. According to WHO, every US$1 invested in water and sanitation generates an estimated US$4.30 in economic returns through reduced healthcare costs, improved productivity, and fewer lost school and workdays (7). Communities with improved WASH services experience fewer disease outbreaks, lower child mortality, better nutrition, higher school attendance, improved maternal health, and stronger resilience during public health emergencies.

Ensuring every child has access to safe water, sanitation, and hygiene requires coordinated efforts from governments, development partners, communities, schools, parents, and civil society. Governments should prioritize investments in safe water supply systems, sanitation infrastructure, and hygiene promotion, particularly in rural and underserved communities. Development partners and civil society organizations should continue supporting innovative WASH programmes that expand access to safe water and sanitation services for vulnerable populations.

Schools should provide safe drinking water, gender-friendly toilets, handwashing stations with soap, and age-appropriate hygiene education. Government and Communities have a vital responsibility to protect local water sources by discouraging open defecation, promoting proper waste disposal, and preventing environmental contamination. Parents also play an important role by teaching children healthy hygiene practices from an early age and ensuring safe water storage and handling at home.

Access to safe water and sanitation should never depend on where a child is born or the income of their family. Ensuring universal access to WASH is not only essential for improving health but also for reducing poverty, promoting education, advancing gender equality, and achieving sustainable development across Africa.

Monday Health Burst is an initiative of CFHI to address issues of basic health concern. Join us every Monday on all our social media platforms for more episodes.

References

  1. WHO & UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP): https://washdata.org
  2. UNICEF – Water Security and Climate Crisis in Africa: https://www.unicef.org
  3. WHO – Drinking Water Fact Sheet: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/drinking-water
  4. UNICEF – Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Programme: https://www.unicef.org/wash
  5. UNICEF Eastern and Southern Africa – Cholera Situation Updates: https://www.unicef.org/esa
  6. UNESCO – Water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Education: https://www.unesco.org
  7. WHO – Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking Water (GLAAS): https://www.who.int/teams/environment-climate-change-and-health/water-sanitation-and-health

 

The WASH Crisis Affecting African Children Read More »

The Hidden Harm of Gender Bias in Parenting

Parenting is one of the most influential responsibilities in shaping a child’s future. Yet, many parents unknowingly raise their children through the lens of gender bias, assigning different expectations, opportunities, emotions, and responsibilities to boys and girls based solely on societal stereotypes. While these practices may seem harmless or culturally acceptable, their long-term consequences can be damaging to children’s mental health, self-esteem, educational outcomes, and overall well-being.

Gender bias in parenting occurs when children are treated differently because of their sex. It often begins early in life. Boys may be encouraged to be strong, assertive, and emotionally reserved, while girls may be expected to be gentle, obedient, and nurturing. These expectations influence how children view themselves and their place in society (1).

Research shows that children begin developing gender awareness between the ages of two and five. During this period, parents play a critical role in shaping beliefs about what boys and girls can or cannot do. When children are repeatedly exposed to restrictive gender messages, they may limit their own aspirations and abilities based on those expectations rather than their true interests and potential (1,2).

One of the most significant hidden harms of gender-biased parenting is its impact on mental health. Boys who are constantly told to “man up,” “be tough,” or “stop crying” may learn to suppress emotions rather than express them in healthy ways. Over time, emotional suppression can contribute to anxiety, depression, anger-related problems, and difficulties in seeking help when needed. Mental health experts have long emphasized that emotional expression is essential for psychological well-being regardless of gender (3).

Girls, on the other hand, often face pressure to prioritize appearance, compliance, and caregiving roles. Constant messages about being “good,” “quiet,” or “beautiful” can create unrealistic standards that undermine self-confidence and self-worth. Research has linked gender stereotypes and restrictive expectations to increased risks of low self-esteem, anxiety, body image concerns, and reduced leadership aspirations among girls (2,4).

Gender bias can also affect educational and career development. For example, boys may be discouraged from pursuing interests perceived as feminine, such as nursing, caregiving, or the arts, while girls may receive less encouragement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. These biases limit children’s opportunities and reinforce inequality across generations (1,5).

Another overlooked consequence is the effect on family relationships. When boys are given greater freedom while girls face stricter controls, or when household responsibilities are distributed unequally based on gender, feelings of resentment and unfairness may develop. Such experiences can affect sibling relationships and shape attitudes toward equality in adulthood (5).

Studies have also found that parental gender attitudes are associated with children’s emotional and behavioral outcomes. Children raised in environments with rigid gender expectations may experience higher levels of emotional distress and difficulties adjusting socially, highlighting the importance of equitable parenting practices (6).

Addressing this issue requires intentional action from parents, caregivers, educators, and communities. Parents can start by encouraging children to explore their interests freely, regardless of gender stereotypes. Household chores should be shared fairly among boys and girls. Children should be taught that emotions are normal and healthy for everyone to express. Parents should also challenge harmful statements such as “boys don’t cry” or “girls can’t do that” whenever they arise.

Furthermore, schools, religious institutions, community organizations, and policymakers must support efforts that promote gender equality and positive parenting practices. Parenting programs that encourage gender-transformative approaches have shown promise in reducing harmful norms and creating healthier environments for children (7).

Every child deserves the freedom to grow, learn, dream, and thrive without the limitations imposed by gender stereotypes. When parents nurture children based on their unique strengths rather than societal expectations, they help raise a generation that is healthier, more confident, emotionally resilient, and better prepared to contribute positively to society.

The hidden harm of gender bias in parenting is not always visible, but its effects are profound. By recognizing and addressing these biases today, we can create a future where every child has an equal opportunity to reach their full potential.

As parents, caregivers, educators, and community leaders, let us examine our own beliefs and practices. Let us create homes where boys and girls are equally valued, equally heard, and equally supported. By challenging gender stereotypes and embracing inclusive parenting, we can protect children’s mental health, promote equality, and build a more just and compassionate society for future generations.

References

  1. UNICEF. Equal Treatment from Day One: Gender-Responsive Parenting.
    https://www.unicef.org/parenting/child-development/what-gender-responsive-parenting
  2. American Psychological Association (APA). Gender Stereotypes.
    https://dictionary.apa.org/gender-stereotype
  3. BMJ Mental Health. Universal, Selective and Indicated Parenting Interventions to Prevent Adverse Mental Health Outcomes in Youth.
    https://mentalhealth.bmj.com/content/28/1/e301613
  4. UNICEF. Tackling Gender Inequality From the Early Years.
    https://www.unicef.org/reports/tackling-gender-inequality-early-years
  5. UNICEF. Resource Package and Training Modules for Promoting Gender-Transformative Parenting.
    https://www.unicef.org/reports/resource-gender-transformative-parenting
  6. Aguirre E., Benzeval M., Murray A. (2024). Parental Gender Attitudes and Children’s Mental Health: Evidence from the UK Household Longitudinal Study.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624000765
  7. BMJ Mental Health. Early Parenting Interventions to Prevent Internalising Problems in Children and Adolescents.
    https://mentalhealth.bmj.com/content/26/1/e300811

 

The Hidden Harm of Gender Bias in Parenting Read More »

The Hidden Impact of Substance Abuse on Children

As the world commemorates the International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking, attention often focuses on individuals who use drugs, alcohol, and tobacco. Yet, another group silently bears the consequences of substance abuse vulnerable children who are homeless, in informal settlements, and in Internally Displaced Persons (IDP) camps. These children may not be using substances themselves, but they are frequently exposed to smoking, alcohol abuse, and drug use by adults and older youths around them. The effects of such exposure extend far beyond physical health and can have profound psychological and emotional consequences (1).

For many vulnerable children, exposure to substance abuse is a daily reality. They witness intoxicated adults, observe risky behaviours, and often live in environments where smoking and drinking are normalized. Research has shown that children learn behaviours by observing those around them, especially adults and older peers. When substance use becomes part of their everyday environment, children may begin to perceive it as an acceptable way to cope with stress, hardship, or emotional pain (2).

Street-connected children are particularly vulnerable. A systematic review involving 50 studies from 22 countries found that substance use is highly prevalent among street children, with an estimated lifetime prevalence of 60%. The review also identified tobacco, alcohol, and inhalants as commonly used substances among this population (2). While these findings focus on substance use among street children, they also highlight the environments in which many vulnerable children’s live environments where exposure to substance abuse is widespread and often unavoidable.

Children who regularly encounter drunken behaviour, substance-related conflicts, neglect, or aggression may experience persistent fear, anxiety, stress, and emotional insecurity. Such experiences can undermine a child’s sense of safety and stability, both of which are essential for healthy emotional development (3).

Children living in IDP camps face additional challenges. Many have already experienced displacement, loss of family members, violence, disruption of education, and uncertainty about the future. Exposure to substance abuse in these settings can compound existing trauma and increase the risk of psychological distress. Mental health experts have consistently noted that repeated exposure to stressful and unsafe environments during childhood can affect emotional regulation, concentration, learning ability, and social relationships later in life (3).

Research among street-living children has also shown that lack of family attachment, exposure to adult substance users, and psychosocial stress are strongly associated with substance use and poor mental well-being among children and adolescents (4). When children grow up surrounded by substance abuse, they may become more susceptible to depression, low self-esteem, behavioural problems, and future substance use themselves.

The effects are not only psychological. Children exposed to second-hand smoke face increased risks of respiratory infections, asthma, impaired lung development, and other health complications. Emerging research also suggests that exposure to tobacco smoke during childhood may affect cognitive development and contribute to learning and behavioural difficulties (5). For vulnerable children already facing multiple hardships, these additional health burdens can further limit their opportunities to thrive.

Perhaps most concerning is that many of these children remain invisible in public health discussions. While humanitarian responses often prioritize food, shelter, and healthcare, the mental and emotional well-being of children exposed to substance abuse frequently receives less attention. Yet mental health is just as important as physical health. A child who lives in constant fear, uncertainty, or emotional distress may carry those experiences into adolescence and adulthood.

Protecting vulnerable children requires a holistic approach. Safe spaces, mental health support services, positive role models, child protection mechanisms, and substance abuse prevention programmes are all critical. Communities must also recognize that substance abuse does not only harm the user; it affects everyone around them, especially children who depend on adults for safety, guidance, and care.

As we observe the International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking, let us remember the forgotten victims of substance abuse. Street-connected children and children living in IDP camps deserve more than survival. They deserve safe environments that nurture their mental health, protect their well-being, and allow them to reach their full potential.

Protecting children from the hidden effects of substance abuse is not only a public health responsibility it is a moral obligation. Every child deserves the opportunity to grow up free from fear, free from harmful influences, and full of hope for the future.

Governments, humanitarian organizations, community leaders, and families must work together to reduce substance abuse in environments where vulnerable children live. Investments in child protection, mental health services, psychosocial support, and substance abuse prevention programmes can help break cycles of vulnerability and create healthier futures for children. By protecting children today, we strengthen the well-being of future generations.

Monday Health Burst is an initiative of CFHI to address issues of basic health concern. Join us every Monday on all our social media platforms for more episodes.

References

  1. Street Children and Drug Abuse. JAMA.
    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/1738906
  2. The Epidemiology of Substance Use Among Street Children in Resource-Constrained Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3776018/
    (PMC)
  3. Protocol for an Observational Study on the Effects of Paternal Alcohol Use Disorder on Children’s Later Life Outcomes.
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15535
    (arXiv)
  4. Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Correlates of Substance Abuse Among Street Children: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Kolkata, India.
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34322422/
    (PubMed)
  5. Research on Childhood Exposure to Second-Hand Smoke and Cognitive/Health Outcomes.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412024007918
    (Reddit)

The Hidden Impact of Substance Abuse on Children Read More »

Gender Inequality: A Threat to the Health, Safety, and Rights of Women and Girls in Nigeria

Gender inequality remains a deeply entrenched threat to the health, safety, and rights of women and girls in Nigeria, undermining progress toward equitable development and directly shaping outcomes in health, education, economic participation, political representation, and freedom from violence. According to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Nigeria ranks 147 out of 191 countries on the Gender Inequality Index, reflecting large disparities between men and women in reproductive health, empowerment, and labour market participation. ¹ These inequalities manifest in real and measurable ways that compromise the wellbeing and opportunities of women and girls across the country.

One of the most profound impacts of gender inequality in Nigeria is observed in health outcomes. The maternal mortality ratio remains unacceptably high at 512 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, indicating that women are still at disproportionate risk during pregnancy and childbirth compared to global averages. ² Factors driving this include limited access to quality reproductive health services, lack of autonomy in health decision-making, and economic barriers that delay care-seeking. Research shows that women who lack financial independence or decision-making power are less likely to utilise antenatal care or deliver in health facilities, increasing the likelihood of preventable complications. ³

Education is another field deeply affected by gender inequality. UNESCO reports that girls’ school completion rates in Nigeria lag boys’, particularly at the secondary level, a gap that translates into reduced opportunities for advanced learning, better jobs, and informed health choices later in life. ⁴ Early marriage, still prevalent in many regions, significantly contributes to school dropout rates among girls. UNICEF estimates that 43% of girls in Nigeria are married before their 18th birthday, limiting educational attainment and exposing them to early pregnancy and increased health risks such as obstetric fistula and maternal mortality. ⁵

Gender-based violence (GBV) is another grave consequence of systemic inequality. The Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) reveals that around 30% of ever-married women aged 15–49 have experienced physical violence, with many cases going unreported due to stigma, fear, and weak legal enforcement. ⁶ Violence affects not only physical health but also leads to long-term psychological trauma, increased vulnerability to HIV infection, and reduced participation in economic and community life. ⁷

Political inequality further illustrates the scale of exclusion. In the current 10th National Assembly (2023–2027), women remain severely underrepresented in national decision-making. Out of 109 Senate seats, only 4 are held by women (approximately 3.7%), while 105 seats (96.3%) are held by men. In the House of Representatives, only 17 out of 360 seats are occupied by women (approximately 4.7%), compared to 343 men. Altogether, women hold just 21 out of 469 seats in the National Assembly, representing about 4.2% of federal lawmakers.¹⁰ This means that despite women making up nearly half of Nigeria’s population, their voice in shaping laws and policies that directly affect their health, safety, and rights remains below 5% — one of the lowest representation rates in the region.¹¹ Limited political participation restricts the advancement of gender-responsive policies and slows progress on critical issues such as maternal health funding, protection from violence, and equal economic opportunities.

Economic inequality further compounds these threats. Although women actively participate in Nigeria’s labour force, wage gaps, informal employment, and occupational segregation persist. The World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Report highlights that women often earn less than men for similar work and remain underrepresented in leadership positions. ⁸ Without economic empowerment, many women are unable to afford essential health services, invest in their education, or break cycles of poverty and dependency.

These disparities are not inevitable; they are shaped by social norms, discriminatory practices, and gaps in policy implementation. Research consistently shows that gender-responsive policies including universal access to reproductive healthcare, enforcement of laws against child marriage, protection from gender-based violence, equal educational opportunities, and increased political inclusion significantly improve health, economic, and social outcomes. ⁹

Addressing gender inequality is therefore not only a moral obligation but also a public health, governance, and economic priority. When women and girls have equal access to education, healthcare, leadership opportunities, and economic resources, maternal and infant mortality decline, household incomes rise, communities become safer, and national development accelerates. Nigeria cannot achieve sustainable development while half of its population remains structurally disadvantaged.

We call on the Federal and State Governments to strengthen and fully enforce laws protecting women and girls from discrimination and violence, expand access to quality healthcare services, promote girls’ education, and implement affirmative measures to increase women’s political representation. Development partners, civil society, and community leaders must intensify advocacy, scale up gender-responsive programming, and challenge harmful norms that sustain inequality. Every sector health, education, justice, governance, and economic development must mainstream gender equity as a foundational principle. The health, safety, and rights of Nigeria’s women and girls demand bold, sustained, and collective action.

References

  1. UNDP Gender Inequality Index
    https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/thematic-composite-indices/gender-inequality-index
  2. WHO Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000–2023
    https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240068759
  3. Journal of Women’s Health – Decision-Making Power & Maternal Service Utilisation
    https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/jwh.2020.8805
  4. UNESCO Institute for Statistics – Girls’ Education
    https://uis.unesco.org/en/topic/girls-education
  5. UNICEF – Child Marriage in Nigeria
    https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-protection/child-marriage/
  6. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS)
    https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR379/FR379.pdf
  7. WHO – Violence Against Women Prevalence Estimates
    https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240022256
  8. World Economic Forum – Global Gender Gap Report 2023
    https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2023.pdf
  9. Journal of Gender & Development – Gender-Responsive Policies
    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13552074.2021.1952743
  10. The Nation Newspaper – Women in the 10th National Assembly
    https://thenationonlineng.net/meet-the-only-four-female-senators-in-10th-nass/
  11. The Guardian Nigeria – Women’s Representation in N’Assembly
    https://guardian.ng/news/national/only-4-5-of-nassembly-members-are-women-says-wilan-report/

Gender Inequality: A Threat to the Health, Safety, and Rights of Women and Girls in Nigeria Read More »

MONDAY HEALTH BURST ON BREASTFEEDING AND MATERNAL MENTAL HEALTH: NURTURING BOTH MOTHER AND CHILD

Breastfeeding is often described as the most natural way to feed a baby, providing essential nutrients and antibodies that protect infants from illness. Beyond its physical health benefits, breastfeeding is an emotional process that can significantly influence a mother’s mental well-being. However, while breastfeeding can be a source of comfort and connection, it can also present emotional challenges that affect a mother’s psychological health.

The Emotional Connection

Breastfeeding stimulates the release of hormones like oxytocin and prolactin, which promote relaxation, bonding, and a sense of fulfillment. Many mothers describe feeding time as a period of closeness that strengthens their connection with their babies. This hormonal and emotional bond can contribute to reduced stress levels and enhanced maternal confidence.

Challenges and Emotional Strain

Not every breastfeeding journey is smooth. Difficulties such as poor latching, low milk supply, engorgement, or mastitis can cause physical discomfort and emotional distress. Some mothers may feel guilt, shame, or inadequacy if they cannot breastfeed as planned. These feelings can be amplified by societal expectations, cultural pressures, and conflicting advice from healthcare providers or family members.

For mothers already at risk of postpartum depression or anxiety, breastfeeding difficulties can intensify symptoms. Lack of sleep, hormonal changes, and the overwhelming demands of caring for a newborn can create a perfect storm for mental health struggles.

Postpartum Depression and Breastfeeding

The relationship between breastfeeding and postpartum depression is complex. For some women, successful breastfeeding is linked to a lower risk of depression due to increased oxytocin and emotional satisfaction. For others, persistent breastfeeding challenges can become a source of stress, increasing feelings of hopelessness and isolation. Recognizing these different experiences is essential to providing the right kind of support.

The Role of Support Systems

Maternal mental health during breastfeeding is best protected when mothers have strong support networks. Partners can share responsibilities such as burping, diaper changes, and household tasks, allowing the mother to rest. Family and friends can offer encouragement rather than criticism, while healthcare providers can provide evidence-based guidance tailored to the mother’s unique needs.

Peer support groups  both in-person and online also give mothers a safe space to share experiences, learn practical tips, and feel understood.

Empowering Informed Choices

One of the most important steps in protecting maternal mental health is removing the pressure to breastfeed at all costs. While exclusive breastfeeding is highly recommended for the first six months, mothers who cannot or choose not to breastfeed should be supported without judgment. The ultimate goal is a healthy, thriving mother and baby and that can be achieved through different feeding approaches.

Breastfeeding is a journey that intertwines physical nourishment with emotional well-being. By acknowledging the mental health dimension of breastfeeding, society can move away from guilt-driven narratives and toward a culture of understanding and support. When a mother’s mental health is prioritized, she is better equipped to care for herself and her child fostering a healthier start to life for both.

Monday Health Burst is an initiative of Centre for Family Health Initiative (CFHI) to tackle issues of basic health concerns. Join us every Monday for more health-related articles on all our social media platforms.

References

  1. Weaning and Maternal Mental Health
  2. 5 common breastfeeding problems | UNICEF Parenting

MONDAY HEALTH BURST ON BREASTFEEDING AND MATERNAL MENTAL HEALTH: NURTURING BOTH MOTHER AND CHILD Read More »

SPEAK WEDNESDAY ON FEEDING THROUGH FEAR: HOW GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE UNDERMINES INFANT HEALTH

“You can’t nourish from an empty cup, and you definitely can’t breastfeed through trauma.”
The right to nourishment is a fundamental human right. Yet, for millions of infants in Nigeria and around the world, that right is compromised from birth, not by poverty alone, but by violence inflicted on the very individuals tasked with nurturing them. As the world marks World Breastfeeding Week, it is imperative to confront a rarely addressed but devastating intersection: the relationship between gender-based violence (GBV) and infant health, particularly breastfeeding outcomes.

Breastfeeding is globally recognized as a cornerstone of infant survival and development. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), optimal breastfeeding could prevent over 823,000 child deaths annually across the globe. However, in households where women face psychological, physical, or sexual violence, the act of breastfeeding becomes compromised, interrupted, or entirely abandoned, placing infants at heightened risk of disease, malnutrition, and death.

Understanding Gender-Based Violence in Nigeria
In Nigeria, gender-based violence is a pervasive issue. According to the National Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS), 30% of Nigerian women aged 15–49 have experienced physical violence since age 15, and 9% experienced sexual violence. The figures are even higher in certain rural communities and internally displaced persons (IDP) camps, where systemic poverty, displacement, and insecurity magnify the risks.

This violence is not limited to isolated acts of cruelty. It is embedded in socio-cultural systems that normalize women’s suffering and silence, even during vulnerable periods such as pregnancy and postpartum. These environments profoundly impact maternal mental health and consequently, infant care practices.
How Gender-Based Violence Impacts Breastfeeding
Numerous peer-reviewed studies affirm that women who experience GBV, especially during or immediately after pregnancy, are significantly less likely to initiate or continue breastfeeding.
1. Physiological Disruption of Lactation
The stress caused by violence increases cortisol levels, which can inhibit the production of oxytocin, a hormone essential for milk let-down. In essence, a mother’s body under chronic threat cannot perform its nurturing functions efficiently.
2. Mental Health Consequences
Women exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV) are at increased risk of postpartum depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). These conditions are linked to early cessation of exclusive breastfeeding.
3. Limited Access to Healthcare
GBV survivors are often restricted in their mobility and decision-making, making them less likely to access maternal health services. This further reduces opportunities for lactation counseling or timely postnatal care, which are vital for breastfeeding success.
4. Physical Trauma
Injuries to the breasts or upper body from physical abuse can make breastfeeding painful or physically impossible. Moreover, repeated violence erodes a mother’s sense of bodily autonomy, which may deter her from engaging in breastfeeding altogether.
Impact on Infant Health
When mothers are unable to breastfeed exclusively for the first six months, a practice strongly endorsed by WHO and UNICEF, the consequences for infants are profound:
• Increased risk of diarrhea, respiratory infections, and undernutrition.
• Higher likelihood of stunted growth and developmental delays.
• Elevated infant mortality, particularly in settings with limited access to safe alternatives.

In Nigeria, where 44% of children under five are stunted, the added burden of disrupted breastfeeding due to GBV further deepens a national child health crisis.
Sociocultural and Structural Drivers

In many Nigerian communities, cultural norms that promote male dominance and female submissiveness inhibit women’s ability to seek help or resist abuse. Violence is often dismissed as “discipline” or a private family affair. These norms are reinforced by:
• Patriarchal interpretations of religion
• Bride price systems that commodify women
• The stigmatization of divorced or single mothers
• Poor legal enforcement of existing protective laws, such as the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act (VAPP Act) of 2015, which remains unadopted in several Nigerian states.
As a result, maternal silence becomes survival, even when that silence compromises infant health.
Recommendations: Multisectoral Action is Imperative
Addressing the impact of GBV on breastfeeding and infant health requires coordinated efforts across health, legal, and community systems. The following actions are recommended:

1. Integrate GBV Screening into Maternal and Child Health Services
Health workers at antenatal, delivery, and postnatal care points must be trained to screen for and respond to GBV sensitively and confidentially.
2. Strengthen Legal Protection and Enforcement
Full domestication and enforcement of the VAPP Act in all 36 states is non-negotiable. Legal systems must prioritize survivor protection, not the preservation of abusive family structures.
3. Community Education and Norms Change
Religious and traditional leaders must be engaged as advocates for safe motherhood. Community dialogues can play a key role in dismantling harmful gender norms.
4. Expand Access to Psychosocial Support
Psychological care, trauma counseling, and peer-support networks for survivors should be embedded within maternal health programs.
5. Data Collection and Research
More localized data is needed to map the intersection of GBV and breastfeeding outcomes in Nigeria. Without robust data, interventions risk being misaligned or underfunded.

Conclusion
Breastfeeding is not only a health practice; it is an act of nurturing, safety, and trust. When a mother is forced to feed through fear, we undermine not just her health but the health of the next generation. Ending GBV is not a side issue in public health; it is central to child survival, gender equity, and national development.
This week, as we celebrate World Breastfeeding Week, we must reaffirm that the ability of Nigerian women to breastfeed in safety and dignity is a national imperative. Silence and cultural complicity can no longer be tolerated. The future of our children, indeed, of our nation, depends on it.
Speak Wednesday is an initiative of CFHI to address issues around gender-based violence and gender bias.
#WorldBreastfeedingWeek #EndGBV #InfantHealth #MaternalHealth #BreastfeedingMatters #SafeMotherhood #SupportSurvivors #NutritionJustice #HealthEquity #VAPPAct #WomensRights
References
• World Health Organization (2017). Protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding in facilities providing maternity and newborn services. https://www.who.int
• National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF. (2019). Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA.
• UNICEF (2019). Programming Guidance: Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies. https://www.unicef.org
• Kendall-Tackett, K. A. (2007). Violence against women and the perinatal period: The impact of lifetime violence and abuse on pregnancy, birth, and breastfeeding. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8(3), 344–353.
• Silverman, J.G., Decker, M.R., Reed, E., & Raj, A. (2006). Intimate partner violence around the time of pregnancy: Association with breastfeeding behavior. Journal of Women’s Health, 15(8), 934–940.
• Kumar, M., Huang, K., Othman, S., Rahman, M., & Lee, S. (2017). Effect of intimate partner violence on breastfeeding behavior: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 7:e014439.
• UNHCR (2021). Nigeria Factsheet – Gender-Based Violence. https://www.unhcr.org/ng
• World Health Organization (2021). Infant and Young Child Feeding. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding

SPEAK WEDNESDAY ON FEEDING THROUGH FEAR: HOW GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE UNDERMINES INFANT HEALTH Read More »